Articles and discussions related to Scientific Publishing, like the Open Access Publishing Models for journals, Article Processing Charges (APC), the journal Impact Factor system and its impact on science, etc. are posted and linked below.
"Company linked to cloned journals of major publishers denies cloning journals of major publishers", Link
"Exclusive: New hijacking scam targets Elsevier, Springer Nature, and other major publishers", Link
"Paper mills: The 'cartel-like' companies behind fraudulent scientific journals" by Rizqy Amelia Zein. Science and Nature, two leading science journals, have revealed a growing problem: an alarming rise in fraudulent research papers produced by shady paper mill companies. This wave of fake studies is creating a major headache for the academic world, putting the integrity of global academic research at risk. Link
"Reflecting on research misconduct: What’s next for the watcher community?". An interview with Daryl Chubin. Link
"The prestige factor propping up academic publishers" by Kathryn Palmer: A federal antitrust lawsuit against a group of megapublishers highlights how academia’s system of rewarding researchers for publishing in certain journals has undermined their leverage. Link
"The good, bad & greedy of academic publishing" by John J. Kennedy: The insistence on Scopus-indexed publications as a marker of quality makes academic research much more expensive and marginalises work from poorer regions and institutes. Link
"Open access: The price of diamond" by Frances Jones: The push for non-profit academic publishing is raising questions about how to pay for it. Link
"Towards a federated global community of Diamond Open Access" by Pierre Mounier (OpenEdition, OPERAS) & Johan Rooryck (cOAlition S): A discussion paper. Link
"Scientists paid large publishers over $1 billion in four years to have their studies published with open access" by Manuel Ansede: A study reveals that academic megajournals ‘Scientific Reports’ and ‘Nature Communications’ have cornered the market. Link
"Avalanche of published academic articles could erode trust in science" by Autonomous University of Barcelona: A rapid rise in the number of academic articles being published could undermine public trust in science, warns an international study posted to the arXiv preprint server. Link
"The death of open access mega-journals?" by Justin Jackson: The entire scientific publishing world is currently undergoing a massive stress test of quantity vs. quality, open access (free) vs. institutional subscriptions (paywall), and how to best judge the integrity of a publication. Link
"The similarity index of scientific publications with equations and formulas, identification of self-plagiarism, and testing of the iThenticate system" by Andrei D. Polyanin, Inna K. Shingareva. Journal reference: Mathematical Modeling and Computational Methods, 2021, No. 2, pp. 96-116. Link
"Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?" by Stephen Buranyi: It is an industry like no other, with profit margins to rival Google – and it was created by one of Britain’s most notorious tycoons: Robert Maxwell. Link
Further links
The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recognizes the need to improve the ways in which researchers and the outputs of scholarly research are evaluated. Link. The ISNMP has signed the DOR declaration.
cOAlition S: The S-Plan: Making full and immediate Open Access a reality. Link
Send us your Comments or Concerns:
You are very welcome to send us your comments about publishing or related issues . Your comments will be published here if we consider it to be relavant. To do so, please send your material by Email.